Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GRIMHAMM3R

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 05:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:GRIMHAMM3R

User's page being used to create and house a content page that has already been deleted as a result of a speedy delete (was noted under db-bio) Mhking 21:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, that's a perfectly legitimate use of userspace (though it usually isn't front-and-center like that). Keep. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In the mainspace, this would be non-notable vanispamcruftisement and in the userspace it would be myspacery (which Wikipedia is not). MER-C 02:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. How is it myspacery? Users are allowed to have personal information on their userpage. And better there than in an article (where, I agree, it would not meet WP:BIO). Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 15:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No encyclopedia contriutions, blatant usage as MySpace.Telly addict 16:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Six weeks with no edits outside user space is long enough. Guy (Help!) 21:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - User has no edits outside his userpage--$UIT 04:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All edits are on userpage. Userpage is used as MySpace. Tohru Honda13 19:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.